MAY 2, 2024 JLM 73°F 03:45 PM 08:45 AM EST
Analysis: Iran-Israel ‘open conflict' shatters Biden’s myth of de-escalation

Shahram Kholdi, exiled from Iran, lives and teaches Politics and History of the Middle East in Canada.

President Joe Biden wishes Israel not to retaliate against the Islamic Republic of Iran’s attempt to attack with 351 drones and missiles. Although the strike largely failed, it set a dangerous precedent.

In line with Biden, many of Israel’s western allies are pressuring Israel not to respond. Everyone is concerned about the breakout of an all-out regional war in the Middle East, and since the attack catastrophically failed, many argue that there is no reason to escalate.

While Israel has declared its intent to “hit back” at Iran, Biden, has declared the US would not participate in any Israeli attack against Iran, while stressing the US’s “Iron Clad” commitment to defend Israel. The last time a US president warned Israel not to attack an adversary, was during the presence of an existential threat in 1967.

Biden’s appeasement policy, billed as “de-escalation” and “containment”, has failed to act as an effective deterrence and critics say the US administration can no longer shrink from its own responsibility with regards to Israel-Iran Proxies entering a phase of “Open Conflict.”

Biden’s continued efforts at “containing” the Iranian regime is informed by domestic economic concerns, namely, skyrocketing oil prices, if the Middle East is plunged into a region wide conflict. Correspondingly, Biden is concerned with his own ongoing unpopularity amongst the independent voters as well as amongst the critical Arab-Muslim voting bloc in bellwether states like Michigan. 

However, long before any such consideration becomes an important part of any “re-election” calculus, the Biden administration’s propensity to “de-escalation”, read “appeasement”, was its Achilles heel that was exploited by Iran and its proxies.

Since assuming the presidency, Joe Biden’s foreign policy has been marred with adopting policy options that have at once emboldened the adversaries of the US and its allies and provoked uncertainty and insecurity amongst many US partners globally. 

Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan marks the first significant misstep that only emboldened various actors, from Russia to Iran, to test the limits of Biden’s “de-escalation” policy. Biden’s vision of US national security, as outlined in Biden’s National Security Strategy, prioritizes the threat Russia and China pose and seeks to proactively confront them in strategic fissure points of conflict like Ukraine and the South China Sea.

Shahram Kholdi has taught Politics and History of the Middle East, History of Oil, and International Relation in various universities in Ontario, Canada, over the past 12 years. He received his doctoral degree from the University of Manchester, UK, in 2011. He is currently preparing doctoral thesis, the Politics of Memory and the Historiography of the 1979 Revolution, for publication as a book.

Did you find this article interesting?
Comments
[Anonymous] 09:18 19.04.2024
Biden is so out of touch and the worst leader in the USA!
Pete Pala 01:25 19.04.2024
The photo is called: Four F-- Ups
byron scherer 00:19 19.04.2024
That's a scary picture Biden Ketchup head climate crook an Anton Blinken who McCain foretold that if he ever ran the state dept he'd have the whole world in ww3.
Aerold Souder 22:15 18.04.2024
No Failure or Inaction This is the Plan
David Maya 22:08 18.04.2024
I am trying to understand his non-confrontational decisions which have taken the vountry
To leave a comment, please log in

DISCOVER MORE

"Iron Swords" - War in Gaza Benjamin Netanyahu Hamas The Iran Threat Biden Administration The Leftist-Islamist Alliance Hezbollah Israeli Technology Palestine = Hamas = ISIS Israeli_Nature 10/7 Hamas Massacres Biblical Archaeology Jihadi Infiltration into the West Heroes of Israel Israel - Iran War The Bible Muslim Persecution of Jews